 | SummaryRecommendationsBackground Information Community Living DataEffective Practices |
|
|
|
 |
Social Services Funding |
|
|
Nationally, "...foundation funding for most major program areas rebounded in 2004, following a two-year decline in giving. Among the close to 1,200 larger private and community foundations included in the Foundation Center’s annual grants sample, grant dollars rose 8.1 percent between 2003 and 2004 to $15.5 billion. The number of grants awarded increased a more modest 4.8 percent, from 120,721 to 126,497."
The Foundation Center |
|
|
Social service organizations are facing reduced funding while service demands increase. There are not only ongoing needs in the community but the addition of need from people not traditionally served by the social services community. Emergency assistance requests are up. Preventive programming remains important, there has been a corresponding shift in funding from prevention to emergency services. This increase in funding requests has had the effect of further diluting a shrinking pool of resources.
The economic downturn has reduced funding from foundations and government. Faced with Stark County’s ongoing needs and an increasing competition for funds, funders have moved dollars to programs that demonstrate the ability to work in concert with multiple organizations with the intent to maximize community impact. These efforts are an attempt to make systemic changes within Stark County. One approach has been to study the programs that have been effective and then to scale up or replicate those programs in order create more efficient and effective programming. In another approach, some agencies and funders in an effort to provide better and more cost effective services, have formed partnerships. Additionally in order to reduce cost and increase efficiency, some large social service organizations in Stark County have merged.
Local social service organizations receive the majority of their funding from local and government grants. These funders are requiring increasing levels of accountability and collaboration. Multi-agency collaborations have in some cases simply divided funding rather than increase it and created difficulty in accountability. Also, grant funding does not provide an assured and ongoing source of revenue resulting in difficulties in future planning. Agencies often are forced to make programming decisions based solely on available funding. United Way of Greater Stark County
GuideStar |
|
|
|